6. The role of gender
Gender makes less difference for learning of activism
than we expected. There may be an effect in relation to governance, but the
sample does not allow to verify this. Still, writing this does not mean that
our activists would not have been fair representatives of their genders. What
they have done has been done in characteristically gendered ways. When Marjaana
cares for her parents and later accepts more general responsibility in this
area, this can be seen as a typical example of female care-centered ethics. The
same is true of Laura, who has become involved with CP association work because
of having to take care of of her own CP child and understanding by that the
more general needs of the disabled.
None of the
persons studied is predominantly a
gender activist, which of course is a selection effect. The problems of a
patriarchal society can be seen in their lives: men getting to higher positions
(Esko a rector of university, Hannu a member of parliament) and being paid in
the average remarkably higher wages than women. The activists also repeat the
common pattern of women taking largely responsibility of the household chores,
childrenīs education and elderly parents, often in addition to paid jobs. In
this they reflect the prevailing way of life, which has been changing, but
rather slowly. Gender activism was in the increase in 70ies and 80ies and the
country got appropriate equality legislation. The slowness of results does not
seem to be an effect of menīs unwillingness of admitting women to responsible
positions (attested by the country having a female president, a female First
Speaker of the parliament, a female head of the most important opposition party
and several female ministers), but rather womenīs own choice. Looking at the
activists and taking into account womenīs domestic work as well as time and
activities with children, menīs economic and political success is balanced by
womenīs family-related achievements, something that the society unfortunately
does not recognize with appropriate wages or pensions.
Women activists
tend to be more conscious of gender issues than men. The male Old Boy -networks
presumably exist, but an active Menīs movement is not recognizable in Finland. It is
relatively common for young fathers-to-be to participate with their wives in
maternity courses and to be present during delivery. Children and youth are
important for men, too, but more as friends, companions or in a generic way
than as a total responsibility for care and socialization. An example of this
is Hannu, generally an advocate for children and adolescents in Finnish
politics.
I
have a dream or vision to combine my love for sport and work for youth still in
my later life. I would like to start a junior soccer team and act as a coach
for it. It would be nice to have my own children along in such activity ...
There are never too many situations, where education and youngsters own
activities were combined in a sensible way, and sport is excellent for that
purpose. I have myself got a lot from sport during the years, itīs a sensible way
of life. (Hannu)
It
is characteristic of this male quote that family responsibility is included
into a larger issue and in a way depersonalized.
Looking at learning
of identities gender makes less difference for learning of activism than might
have been expected. Despite the differences in careers, the learning histories
of women and men are surprisingly similar. There may be an effect in relation
to governance (considering the higher achievements of men), but the sample does
not allow to verify this.